The Oakwood Suites
← All case studies
Midscale Bengaluru 95 Keys BBZ-BLR-2024-052

The Oakwood Suites

Midscale Corporate Transient

RevPAR Growth +57.1% ₹2,784 → ₹4,374
Occupancy +23 pts 58% → 81%
ADR Movement +12.5% ₹4,800 → ₹5,400
Direct Share Shift +34 pts 18% → 52%

Client Profile

Asset Class Midscale all-suite, 95 keys, Outer Ring Road corridor
Positioning Corporate transient, extended stay, project teams
Feeder Markets Domestic corporate (71%), international project teams (14%), leisure overflow (15%)
Competitive Set 19 midscale and upper-midscale properties in the ORR technology corridor
Systems Landscape Legacy PMS, no channel manager, booking engine unchanged since 2017
Structural Issue Weekday-dependent demand with no contracted corporate base

Engagement Parameters

Engagement Length 28 weeks
Advisory Team Engagement Partner, Corporate Sales Lead, CRO Engineer, Paid Media Lead
Workstreams 4 workstreams, corporate contracting on the critical path
Data Reviewed 24 months PMS, booking-engine session recordings, 3 RFP cycles missed
Governance Weekly during RFP season, fortnightly otherwise
01 — Context

Situation &
Complication

The commercial position as found at the start of the engagement, before any intervention.

The situation

The Oakwood Suites sits in the Outer Ring Road technology corridor, surrounded by the exact corporate demand its all-suite product is designed to serve. It was capturing almost none of it on contract. Occupancy of 58% was assembled almost entirely from OTA-sourced transient business at 82% channel share, which meant the property was paying commission on corporate travellers whose employers had negotiated rates at competitors two kilometres away. The property had never participated in a corporate RFP cycle and was not loaded in any travel management company system.

The complication

Two failures compounded. The first was commercial: the property had missed three consecutive annual RFP seasons, which in corporate travel is not a recoverable position within a single cycle — rates are loaded annually and a property absent from the cycle is invisible for twelve months regardless of its merits. The second was technical: the booking engine, unchanged since 2017, abandoned 88% of sessions that reached the payment step. It offered no UPI, no corporate billing option, no GST invoice capture, and required account creation before checkout. Even the corporate demand the property did attract directly could not transact. The property was simultaneously unable to be contracted and unable to be booked.

Missing out on mid-week corporate business travel contracts. Outdated booking engine with 88% cart abandonment, combined with zero retargeting ads.

Engagement scoping note
02 — Diagnostic

What the data showed

Each finding below was evidenced against a named data source and quantified before any remediation was proposed. Impact figures are annualised.

01

Three consecutive corporate RFP cycles missed

EvidenceNo submissions to Lanyon or Cvent in three annual cycles; property not loaded in any TMC system serving the corridor.

Quantified impact ₹2.10 Cr / yr of addressable contracted demand unavailable
02

Booking engine abandoned 88% of payment-step sessions

EvidenceSession recordings across 4,200 sessions; mandatory account creation, card-only payment, no GST field, 11 form fields before payment.

Quantified impact ₹1.34 Cr / yr in unconverted direct demand
03

No GST invoicing capability at point of booking

EvidenceGST details captured manually at checkout, invoice issued post-stay. Corporate bookers systematically routed to competitors offering booking-time invoicing.

Quantified impact Structural exclusion from reimbursable corporate travel
04

Weekend inventory was effectively unsold

EvidenceFriday-Sunday occupancy averaged 31% against 68% Monday-Thursday, with no leisure or long-stay proposition addressing the gap.

Quantified impact ₹0.88 Cr / yr in idle weekend capacity
05

Zero retargeting against a high-consideration booking window

EvidenceMedian 6-day research window for corporate transient; no remarketing, no abandoned-booking recovery, no email or WhatsApp follow-up.

Quantified impact Full loss of a 6-day influenceable window
Mid-week corporate demand rebuilt through structured RFP participation.
Mid-week corporate demand rebuilt through structured RFP participation.
Booking engine rebuilt from an 88% abandonment baseline.
Booking engine rebuilt from an 88% abandonment baseline.
WhatsApp recovery sequence deployed against abandoned bookings.
WhatsApp recovery sequence deployed against abandoned bookings.
03 — Approach

Workstream architecture

The engagement ran as parallel workstreams with distinct owners and measurable gates, rather than as a single sequential programme.

WS1

Corporate Contracting & RFP Entry

Weeks 1-20

Enter the contracted corporate market the property had never accessed.

  • Built a corporate rate strategy with LNR tiers benchmarked against 19 compset properties.
  • Registered and submitted to the annual RFP cycle across Lanyon and Cvent.
  • Direct-contracted 34 corridor accounts outside the formal RFP process.
  • Loaded the property into 6 TMC systems serving the corridor.
OwnerCorporate Sales Lead
Governing KPIContracted accounts; contracted room nights
WS2

Booking Engine Reconstruction

Weeks 3-16

Make the direct channel capable of taking a corporate booking.

  • Rebuilt checkout to 3 steps with guest checkout; removed mandatory account creation.
  • Added UPI, net banking, corporate card and pay-at-hotel options.
  • Introduced GST detail capture at booking with automated invoice issue.
  • Reduced form fields from 11 to 5; added company-name autofill for contracted accounts.
OwnerCRO Engineer
Governing KPIPayment-step abandonment rate
WS3

Recovery & Retargeting

Weeks 10-24

Work the 6-day consideration window the property had been ignoring.

  • Deployed a 3-touch WhatsApp abandoned-booking sequence at 1h, 24h and 72h.
  • Built Meta and Google remarketing audiences segmented by corridor and stay-length intent.
  • Introduced a corporate-rate landing experience for contracted account traffic.
  • Implemented server-side conversion tracking reconciled to PMS arrivals.
OwnerPaid Media Lead
Governing KPIRecovered bookings; blended CPA
WS4

Weekend Demand Development

Weeks 14-28

Address the 37-point weekday/weekend occupancy gap.

  • Built an extended-stay proposition targeting project teams over weekend gaps.
  • Launched a weekend leisure rate for the domestic drive-in market from adjacent cities.
  • Introduced weekly and monthly rate ladders for long-stay project bookings.
  • Targeted relocation and serviced-apartment demand with a dedicated proposition.
OwnerEngagement Partner
Governing KPIWeekend occupancy; average length of stay
04 — Delivery

Phase plan and stage gates

No phase advanced until its gate condition was independently verified against source-system data.

Phase 0 — Diagnostic Weeks 1-4
Session recordings analysed; RFP calendar mapped; corridor account list built.
Stage gateBoard approval for engine rebuild capex
Phase 1 — Engine Rebuild Weeks 5-16
New checkout live; UPI and GST capture deployed; abandonment below 55%.
Stage gatePayment-step abandonment below 60%
Phase 2 — RFP Season Weeks 8-20
Lanyon and Cvent submissions filed; 34 direct contracts signed; TMC loading complete.
Stage gateAbove 100 contracted accounts
Phase 3 — Recovery & Weekend Weeks 18-28
WhatsApp recovery live; weekend proposition launched; long-stay ladders active.
Stage gateWeekend occupancy above 55%
Phase 4 — Handover Weeks 26-28
RFP calendar and account management transferred; renewal cadence documented.
Stage gateClient managing the account book
05 — Commercial outcome

Financial bridge

Trailing twelve months prior vs. trailing twelve months post. 95 keys × 365 nights = 34,675 available room nights. Blended OTA commission 18%. Rooms revenue only.

Line item Before After Movement
Available room nights 34,675 34,675
Occupancy 58.0% 81.0% +23.0 pts
ADR ₹4,800 ₹5,400 +12.5%
RevPAR ₹2,784 ₹4,374 +57.1%
Rooms revenue ₹9.65 Cr ₹15.17 Cr +₹5.52 Cr
OTA share of room nights 82% 48% -34 pts
OTA commission paid ₹1.42 Cr ₹1.31 Cr -₹0.11 Cr
Commission as % of rooms revenue 14.76% 8.64% -6.12 pts
Commission avoided vs. counterfactual ₹0.93 Cr Avoided cost

Partner commentary

Contracted corporate business supplied 14.8 points of the 23-point occupancy gain and, because it arrives commission-free, carried a disproportionate share of the margin improvement. The engine rebuild is the intervention with the clearest attributable return: payment-step abandonment fell from 88% to 41%, and the recovered volume alone would have justified the capex within seven months. Weekend occupancy rose from 31% to 62%, closing most of the weekday gap that had made the asset structurally inefficient.

06 — Channel mix

Where the
bookings moved

Share of total room nights by originating channel, before and after the engagement.

Before engagement
OTA 82%
Direct 18%
After engagement
OTA 48%
Direct 52%

Results commentary

This engagement is the clearest case in the portfolio for sequencing capability before demand. Had the corporate contracting workstream succeeded while the booking engine still abandoned 88% of payment attempts, the contracted accounts would have booked through TMC and OTA channels and the commission position would have worsened. Completing WS2 before WS1 rates went live was the decision that made the economics work.

07 — Risk management

Risk register and mitigations

Risks identified at scoping, with the controls applied. Each was reviewed at every steering committee for the life of the engagement.

Risk

RFP submission rejected on first cycle

Mitigation

34 direct corridor contracts pursued in parallel so that contracted volume did not depend solely on the formal cycle.

Risk

Engine rebuild overruns into RFP season

Mitigation

Engine work sequenced to complete before rate loading; parallel subdomain deployment removed cutover risk from the critical path.

Risk

Corporate rates cannibalise higher-rated transient

Mitigation

LNR tiers fenced by last-room-availability rules and blackout on 26 identified high-compression dates.

Risk

Weekend leisure positioning conflicts with corporate identity

Mitigation

Weekend proposition run under a distinct campaign identity with no change to corporate-facing collateral.

08 — Interventions deployed

Execution summary

01 Corporate RFP Bidding (Lanyon)
02 Direct Booking Engine CRO
03 WhatsApp Abandoned Cart Recovery
04 Meta Lookalike Retargeting
Our direct corporate segments grew by 40% after BBZ connected us to major RFP networks. The WhatsApp booking recovery tool recovers 15% of abandoned carts automatically.
General Manager The Oakwood Suites, Bengaluru
09 — Transferable findings

What this engagement generalises

Observations from this engagement that we have found to hold across comparable assets.

01

Corporate travel operates on an annual loading cycle. A property absent from the cycle is invisible for twelve months regardless of product quality or price.

02

GST invoicing at the point of booking is not an accounting detail in reimbursable corporate travel — it is a hard qualification criterion.

03

A weekday-weighted asset with an unaddressed weekend is carrying roughly a third of its fixed cost against no revenue.

04

Fix the ability to transact before you buy the demand. The reverse order converts a conversion problem into a commission problem.

Commercial gap audit

Would this diagnostic find the same leaks in your property?

Our senior consultants run the same evidence-first assessment across distribution mix, parity integrity, conversion capability and attribution accuracy — and quantify each finding before proposing any remediation.

Advisory engagement in session

Methodology note: Metrics compare matching trailing-twelve-month periods before and after the engagement and are drawn from client property management and channel-manager systems. Counterfactual commission figures model the pre-engagement channel mix applied to post-engagement revenue and are presented as avoided cost, not as cash saved. Outcomes reflect the specific market, asset and operating conditions described and are not a projection of results for other properties.